Cases 61 - 70 of 105
Hill v. Parker et al
as 7:2012cv00172
Respondent:
Blue Ridge Regional Jail Authority and Bill Parker
Petitioner:
Keith Lamonte Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Matthews v. Sobh
as 1:2012cv00294
Plaintiff:
Alexander Otis Matthews
Defendant:
Bill Parlucci Sobh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lamarca et al v. Virginia State Board of Elections et al
as 1:2011cv01255
Plaintiff:
Amy Lamarca , Jon-Christopher Bolling , Nancy McPherson and others
Defendant:
Virginia State Board of Elections , Charles Judd , Kimberly Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Adkins
as 7:2011cv00490
Defendant:
Lt. Adkins
Plaintiff:
William Bill Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AvePoint, Inc. v. Quest Software, Inc. et al
as 7:2011cv00484
Plaintiff:
AvePoint, Inc.
Defendant:
Bill Evans and Quest Software, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Jones v. McDonald
as 7:2011cv00237
Plaintiff:
Marketta D Jones
Defendant:
Dr. Bill McDonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. West et al
as 7:2011cv00236
Plaintiff:
David C. Carter
Defendant:
Bill Crary and Scott West
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter et al v. Virginia State Board of Elections et al
as 3:2011cv00030
Defendant:
Willam Bill Bolling, Kimberly Bowers, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II and others
Plaintiff:
Henry Lee Carter and Gregory M. Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Clark v. Cheeseboro et al
as 2:2011cv00097
Plaintiff:
William Bill Clark
Defendant:
M. Cheeseboro, C/O Simmons, Sgt. Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
