Cases 61 - 70 of 491
Mwasi v. Broomfield et al
as 3:2023cv01072
Plaintiff:
King Mwasi
Defendant:
Warden Ron Broomfield, Ralph Diaz, CA Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vernon Evans v. Ron Broomfield
as 2:2023cv00244
Petitioner:
Vernon Evans
Defendant:
Ron Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In re: Steven Crittenden, et al v. Kathleen Allison, et al
as 23-15132
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CIM-SQ TRANSFER CASES
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WILBERT HENRY LEE, LACEDRIC W. JOHNSON, ROBERT LEE COLE, Jr. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
KATHLEEN ALLISON, RON BROOMFIELD, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Brown v. Broomfield et al
as 5:2023cv00783
Plaintiff:
Roy L. Brown
Defendant:
Ron Broomfield, Ralph Diaz, Ron Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Spurgeon et al
as 4:2023cv00327
Plaintiff:
Paul David Johnson
Defendant:
D. Spurgeon, N. Avila, A. Pachynski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. John Broomfield, Jr.
as 23-1311
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
John Earl Broomfield, Jr.
Paschall v. Broomfield
as 3:2022cv08518
Petitioner:
Lamar S. Paschall
Respondent:
Warden Ron Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jon Goldberg v. Ron Broomfield
as 23-15053
Petitioner / Appellant:
JON GOLDBERG
Respondent / Appellee:
RON BROOMFIELD and RONALD BROOMFIELD
Johnson v. Sanchez et al
as 4:2022cv07858
Plaintiff:
Paul David Johnson
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Sanchez, Lieutenant Boise and R. Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Broomfield
as 4:2022cv09053
Plaintiff:
Paul David Johnson
Defendant:
Acting Warden Ronald Broomfield and L. Tobin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
