Cases 61 - 70 of 231
Armstrong v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2017cv05019
Plaintiff:
Gregory Armstrong
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Nathan Deal, Gwinnett County Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Conway
as 1:2017cv04759
Petitioner:
Denzel D. Morris
Respondent:
R. L. (Butch) Conway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harris v. Unknown Defendant(s)
as 2:2017cv00265
Plaintiff:
Latrice Harris
Defendant:
Butch Conway, Commissioner of Gwinnett County, Lillian Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ashleigh Forte v. Butch Conway, et al
as 17-15216
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ASHLEIGH FORTE, individually and as administrator of the estate of the Estate of Denise Gertrude Forte
Defendant - Appellee:
BUTCH CONWAY, in his individual and official capacities and DON PINKARD, in his individual and official capacities
:
SERVICE
Sherwood v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2017cv04529
Plaintiff:
Jahmal Isaiah Sherwood
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Brian Kemp, Gwinnett County State Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeLacruz v. McMinn et al
as 1:2017cv04224
Plaintiff:
Thomas DeLacruz
Defendant:
McMinn and Butch Conway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Horne v. Warden, et al
as 17-14328
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES ELLIOTT HORNE
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, Paulding Detention Center and BUTCH CONWAY, GCSD
Fernandez v. Conway et al
as 1:2017cv03465
Plaintiff:
Miguel Hernandez Fernandez
Defendant:
R. L. Butch Conway, Don Pinkard, One Unknown Rapid Response Team Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Gwinnett County Detention Center et al
as 1:2017cv03390
Plaintiff:
Denzel Morris
Defendant:
Gwinnett County Detention Center and Butch Conway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Conway et al
as 1:2017cv02958
Plaintiff:
Antoinne Rashaun Cooper
Defendant:
Butch Conway, Strickland, Barber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
