Cases 61 - 70 of 164
Calhoun v. Hays County Jail
as 1:2017cv00481
Plaintiff:
Dean E. Calhoun
Defendant:
Hays County Jail and Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CALHOUN v. TIDY INVESTMENT LP II et al
as 4:2017cv01355
Plaintiff:
DWAYLON CALHOUN
Defendant:
TIDY INVESTMENT LP II and INTERSTATE HOTELS AND RESORTS, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv01248
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calhoun v. Flynn et al
as 4:2017mc00986
Plaintiff:
Sam Calhoun
Defendant:
John Flynn and Scott B. Mc Clelland
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Calhoun v. AAA Life Insurance Company
as 4:2017cv00180
Plaintiff:
Nancy Calhoun
Defendant:
AAA Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv01203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Calhoun v. Villa et al
as 4:2016cv03001
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Oshea Calhoun
Defendant:
Tony Villa, G D Rogers, Z. J. Mathis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bolden v. Henry et al
as 5:2016cv00096
Plaintiff:
Tito T Bolden
Defendant:
Ricky D Henry, Rachel A Ganus, Christopher L Sellers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alpine Communications LC et al v. Level 3 Communications LLC et al
as 3:2016cv01893
Plaintiff:
Alpine Communications LC , BTC Inc , Cascade Communications Company and others
Defendant:
Level 3 Communications LLC , Wiltel Communications LLC and Global Crossing Telecommunications Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Galvan v. Calhoun County et al
as 6:2016cv00002
Plaintiff:
Jose Galvan
Defendant:
Calhoun County , George Aleman , Phoenix Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
