Cases 61 - 70 of 591
MATHEWS v. WALTERS
as 3:2022cv24816
Plaintiff:
CARLTON XAIVER MATHEWS
Defendant:
W WALTERS and GUNN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gary v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Pinellas County)
as 8:2022cv02599
Petitioner:
Carlton Edward Gary
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BARROS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20326
Plaintiff:
CARLTON BARROS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
THEUS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20211
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CARLTON THEUS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MATHEWS v. WALTERS et al
as 3:2022cv19312
Plaintiff:
CARLTON XAVIER MATTHEWS and CARLTON XAVIER MATHEWS
Defendant:
W WALTERS, C LESSER, CATTNECH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARLTON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19264
Plaintiff:
THEODORE CARLTON, III
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CHASE v. BURROWS et al
as 5:2022cv00197
Plaintiff:
LINDA CHASE
Defendant:
CHARLOTTE BURROWS, MERRICK GARLAND, JASON COODY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 0:2022cv61563
Plaintiff:
Carlton Wilson
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hooker v. Hernandez Covington et al
as 8:2022cv01862
Plaintiff:
Carlton Eugene Hooker, Jr.
Defendant:
Virginia M. Hernandez Covington, Thomas P. Barber and Steven D. Merryday
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Hooker v. Hernandez-Covington
as 8:2022cv01763
Plaintiff:
Carlton Eugene Hooker, Jr.
Defendant:
Virginia Maria Hernandez-Covington, Virginia M. Hernandez Covington and Thomas Patrick Barber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
