Cases 61 - 70 of 150
Abreu v. Brown
as 18-1242
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant - Appellee:
Kevin J. Brown, Edward Meyer, Jeffrey Keenan and others
McQueen v. Brown et al
as 2:2018cv00766
Plaintiff:
Lamar McQueen
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Jeffrey Carrick, Medical Executive and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abreu v. Brown et al
as 1:2018cv01634
Plaintiff:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant:
Kevin J. Brown, Edward Meyer, Jeffrey Keenan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00945
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Carrick v. Rice et al
as 3:2018cv00454
Plaintiff:
Paul M. Carrick, III
Defendant:
Tamyra Rice , Kathy Mollow Previsitch , Robin Bolster-Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NBA Properties, Inc. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2017cv08416
Plaintiff:
University of South Carolina, NHL Enterprises, L.P., MLB Advanced Media, L.P. and others
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Wong Mine, mandy mandy and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Sims v. Sprint/United Management Company
as 3:2017cv06001
Plaintiff:
Carrick Sims
Defendant:
Sprint/United Management Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stevens v. Beard et al
as 1:2017cv01002
Plaintiff:
Lyralisa Lavena Stevens
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beard, Christopher Podratz, Godwin Ugwueze and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mango v. USA
as 6:2017cv00163
Petitioner:
Carrick Mango
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Carrick v. Santa Cruz County Planning Department et al
as 5:2017cv03482
Plaintiff:
Paul M. Carrick, III
Defendant:
Santa Cruz County Planning Department, Kathy Mollow Prevsitch, Tamyra Rice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
