Cases 61 - 70 of 107
Cox v. Commissioner, Social Security
as 1:2015cv01896
Plaintiff:
Angel D. Cox
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Selective Insurance Company of America v. Richfield Station Homeowners Association, Inc. et al
as 8:2015cv01063
Plaintiff:
Selective Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
Richfield Station Homeowners Association, Inc., Richfield Station I Joint Venture, Richfield Station II Joint Venture, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv03702
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Cox et al v. Prince Georges County, Maryland et al
as 8:2014cv03408
Plaintiff:
Donnell David Cox, Jr, Mercedes T. Cox, Shanell Cox and others
Defendant:
Prince Georges County, Maryland, John S. Farrell, Prince George's Coutny Police Detective B.E.Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pronin v. Richardson et al
as 8:2014cv01325
Plaintiff:
Dmitry Pronin
Defendant:
Deborah Richardson, Baltimore County, J. F. Caraway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv02479
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Doe v. Alter et al
as 1:2013cv01548
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Matthew Alter, Nathan Arger, Frederick Mervin Bardell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01264
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cox v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2013cv00776
Plaintiff:
Octavius Chyne Cox
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
