Cases 61 - 70 of 107
LANE VS. DOGGENDORF
as 1:2013cv00879
Defendant:
CAPTAIN DOGGENDORF
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN LANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LANE v. DOGGENDORF
as 1:2013cv00855
Defendant:
CAPTAIN DOGGENDORF
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN LANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HECKING v. NEW HAMPSHIRE CONJUNCTIVE PARTIES et al
as 1:2013cv00565
Defendant:
ATTY. MS. "PAT", MS. KELLY AYOTTE, MS. KATHRYN BARGER and others
Plaintiff:
CAPTAIN DIRCK HECKING
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Freed v. Tucker et al
as 3:2013cv00185
Plaintiff:
Michael G Freed
Defendant:
Captain Tucker, Captain Truax, Leautinant Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. USP TERRE-HAUTE et al
as 2:2013cv00087
Defendant:
ASSOCIATE WARDEN, CAPTAIN, HEALTH SERVICE ADMINISTRATOR and others
Plaintiff:
RICKY JEROME SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MCKINNEY v. OLIVER et al
as 2:2013cv00012
Defendant:
LT. CROOKS, C. L. LOCKETT, J. OLIVER and others
Plaintiff:
DORO R. MCKINNEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
GLASCO v. MCKINNEY et al
as 1:2012cv01570
Defendant:
Nurse DILLOW, Captain MCKINNEY, Doctor NELSON and others
Plaintiff:
CONZALOS GLASCO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
HECKING v. NHCOSH
as 1:2012cv01551
Plaintiff:
CAPTAIN DIRCK HECKING
Defendant:
NHCOSH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Anglin v. Lewis et al
as 3:2012cv00488
Plaintiff:
Troy Anglin
Defendant:
Rick Lewis, Captain Grandon and Nurse Blair
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHADWICK v. MARION COUNTY JAIL II (CCA) et al
as 1:2012cv01174
Defendant:
BOES, WARDEN CONWAY, CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN T. CHADWICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
