Cases 61 - 70 of 102
Cooke v. Moody et al
as 1:2011cv00030
Plaintiff:
James E. Cooke, Jr.
Defendant:
Mary Moody , R. Charles and Carl C. Danberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooke v. Morgan et al
as 1:2011cv00031
Plaintiff:
James E. Cooke, Jr.
Defendant:
Phil Morgan , Ann Downing , Politi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeffery Simms v. Perry Phelps, et al
as 11-1060
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFERY ALONZO SIMMS
Defendant - Appellee:
PERRY PHELPS, Warden, CARL C. DANBERG, Comm. and ATTY GEN DE
Cooper v. Morgan et al
as 1:2011cv00105
Defendant:
Phil Morgan , Ann Downing , Politi and others
Plaintiff:
Joe F. Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donald Parkell v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 10-4754
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD D. PARKELL
Defendant - Appellee:
CARL C. DANBERG, Commissioner of Prisons, in his individual and offical capacities, PERRY PHELPS, in his individual and official capacities, DAVID PIERCE, in his individual and official capacities and others
Detlef Hartmann v. Martin O'Connor, et al
as 10-4521
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DETLEF F. HARTMANN
Defendant - Appellee:
MARTIN O'CONNOR, JOHN VAUGHN, JOHN YOUNG and others
Cooke v. Goldstein et al
as 1:2010cv00893
Plaintiff:
James E. Cooke, Jr.
Defendant:
Aaron Goldstein, Joseph R. Biden, III, Carl C. Danberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooke v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv00859
Plaintiff:
James E. Cooke, Jr.
Defendant:
Carl C. Danberg, Aaron Goldstein, Phil Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Biggins v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv00732
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Carl C. Danberg, Thomas L. Carroll, Mike Deloy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilman v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv00672
Plaintiff:
Andrew R. Gilman
Defendant:
Carl C. Danberg, Perry Phelps, Jim Welch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
