Cases 61 - 70 of 232
Carter v. Roadtex LTL, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00082
Defendant:
Bret Taggart, Invest Optima, LLC and Roadtex LTL, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Bobby Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 mv
Harris et al v. USP Big Sandy Warden Joyner et al
as 3:2020cv00321
Plaintiff:
Julius Lee Thomas, Charlie Harris, RonDell Harris and others
Defendant:
Employees/Staff Officers, Etc., USP Big Sandy Food Services Admin, USP Big Sandy Warden Joyner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boling v. JUUL Labs, Inc.
as 5:2020cv00089
Defendant:
JUUL Labs, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Carter Boling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hale v. Carter Co. Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 0:2020cv00022
Defendant:
Timothy Jackson, Carter Co. City Police, Eric Ross and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick K. Hale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lemaster et al v. Lawrence County, Kentucky et al
as 0:2020cv00012
Defendant:
Lawrence County, Kentucky and Phillip L. Carter
Plaintiff:
Billy Lemaster and Amanda Lemaster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clopton v. Boyd et al
as 5:2019cv00205
Defendant:
Deputy Smith, Sergeant Robison, Sergeant Joiner and others
Plaintiff:
Chasity D. Clopton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2019cv00186
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Stephanie L. Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Al Maqablh v. Carter et al
as 3:2019cv00083
Plaintiff:
Ali Al Maqablh
Defendant:
John Carter, Derrick Todd Norberg, Mary Elizabeth Eade and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Eastern District Court of Kentucky Central Division of Lexington
as 5:2019cv00404
Defendant:
Eastern District Court of Kentucky Central Division of Lexington
Plaintiff:
Paul Lee Carter, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
United States of America v. Carter et al
as 1:2019cv00113
Defendant:
Misty D. Carter and Charles Carter
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
