Cases 61 - 70 of 99
Nyhus v. City of Blaine et al
as 0:2013cv02878
Defendant:
City of Blaine , City of Bloomington , City of Brainerd and others
Plaintiff:
Natalie Ann Nyhus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Arcaro v. City of Anoka et al
as 0:2013cv02772
Plaintiff:
Ashley Arcaro
Defendant:
City of Anoka , City of Brooklyn Park , City of Clarkfield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mitchell v. Aitkin County et al
as 0:2013cv02167
Plaintiff:
Dawn Mitchell
Defendant:
Aitkin County , City of Aitkin , Anoka County and others
Guthrie, et al. v. Roseville, et al.
as 2:2013cv01505
Plaintiff:
Victoria Guthrie and Matthew Tullgren
Defendant:
City Of Roseville, Tom Cabral, Daniel Hahn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
East Bay Municipal Utility District et al v. Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc.
as 3:2013cv02032
Plaintiff:
East Bay Municipal Utility District , Sacramento County Water Agency , Freeport Water Authority and others
Defendant:
Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
Bass v. Anoka County et al
as 0:2013cv00860
Plaintiff:
Brooke Nicole Bass
Defendant:
Anoka County, Benton County , Blue Earth County and others
Fajman v. City of Roseville et al
as 2:2012at01002
Defendant:
City of Roseville, Roseville Police Department, Officer D. stokes and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Fajman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Fajman v. City of Roseville et al
as 2:2012cv01895
Defendant:
City of Roseville, Roseville Police Department and D. Stokes
Plaintiff:
Michael Fajman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
City of Roseville v. Lexington Insurance Co.
as 2:2012cv01758
Plaintiff:
City of Roseville
Defendant:
Lexington Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
