Cases 61 - 70 of 3,620
PLUMMER v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2024cv00088
Petitioner:
WILLIAM PLUMMER
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Harris v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
as 1:2023cv02150
Petitioner:
Keeba Harris
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROWN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2023cv02157
Petitioner:
ANTHONY BROWN
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patelunas v. Estate of Anthony Lupas Jr. et al
as 3:2023cv02130
Plaintiff:
Jerome J. Patelunas and Jerome J. Patelunas, II
Defendant:
Estate of Anthony Lupas Jr., Unknown Co-Conspirators-Luzerne County, F.B.I. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
GIMBER v. WAHL et al
as 2:2023cv05082
Petitioner:
JOSEPH E. GIMBER
Respondent:
MARK WAHL, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
