Cases 61 - 70 of 3,633
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Curtis Smith, Jr.
as 24-1499
Plaintiff:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Defendant:
CURTIS GREGORY SMITH, JR.
DiValentino v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al
as 3:2024cv00030
Petitioner:
Anthony J. DiValentino
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Civil Rights: Other
NARANJO v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2024cv00283
Petitioner:
ISAAC NARANJO
Respondent:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, PA ATT. GENERAL, PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gabriel Pittman v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 24-1122
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL ISHAM PITTMAN
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, JOHN RIVELLO, SCI Huntingdon Facility Manager and B. BEISH, SCI Huntingdon AA Block Unit Manager
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA v. BRADLEY et al
as 2:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Defendant:
AISHA ASHA BRADLEY, SUMMIT PARK EAST, GP, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Aisha Bradley
as 24-1355
Petitioner:
In re: AISHA ASHA BRADLEY
Respondent:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SUMMIT PARK EAST GP, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO and others
Aisha Bradley
as 24-1356
Petitioner:
In re: AISHA ASHA BRADLEY
Respondent:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SUMMIT PARK EAST GP, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
USA, et al v. Google LLC
as 24-5006
Plaintiff:
United States of America, State of Arkansas, State of Florida and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Other:
Brad Greenspan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
