Cases 61 - 70 of 70
Carter v. Daviess County Detention Center et al
as 4:2008cv00002
Plaintiff:
Velicia M. Carter
Defendant:
Daviess County Detention Center, David Osborne, Daviess County Fiscal Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
French v. Daviess County, Kentucky et al
as 4:2007cv00105
Plaintiff:
Billy Joseph French
Defendant:
Daviess County, Kentucky, David Osborne and John and Jane Does, Nos. 1, 2, and 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Raley v. Osborne et al
as 4:2007cv00070
Plaintiff:
Todd Jason Raley
Defendant:
David Osborne and Vicki Ison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Black v. Osborne
as 4:2007cv00072
Plaintiff:
Patrick Scott Black
Defendant:
David Osborne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blay v. Daviess County Detention Center et al
as 4:2007cv00069
Plaintiff:
Tamir Maurice Blay
Defendant:
Daviess County Detention Center, David Osborne, Jason C. Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Craig v Jefferson County, et al
as 3:2007cv00235
Plaintiff:
James Wesley Craig
Defendant:
Sgt. Davis, Officer Masinige, Officer Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carrillo v. Osborne et al
as 4:2007cv00050
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Carrillo, Sr.
Defendant:
David Osborne, Carol Byrd, Vickie Isom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mullins v. Osborne
as 3:2007cv00138
Plaintiff:
William David Mullins
Defendant:
David Osborne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spence v. Osborne et al
as 4:2007cv00021
Plaintiff:
Ricky Dale Spence
Defendant:
David Osborne and Jay Wethington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aull v. Osborne
as 4:2007cv00016
Plaintiff:
Gregory Aull
Defendant:
David Osborne, Pam Bartlett and Vickie Isom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
