Cases 61 - 70 of 81
Leos v. Baker et al
as 6:2014cv00923
Plaintiff:
Rafael Zachary Leos
Defendant:
Eddie Baker, Pam Pace and Unidentified Dobbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Helpenstell et al v. Equicredit Corporation of America et al
as 3:2014cv03659
Plaintiff:
Donald G Helpenstell and April Helpenstell
Defendant:
Equicredit Corporation of America , Select Portfolio Servicing Inc , Bright Mortgage Corp and others
Counter_claimant:
Equicredit Corporation of America
Counter_defendant:
April Helpenstell and Donald G Helpenstell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01464
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Dobbs v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 3:2013cv03853
Plaintiff:
Larry Dobbs
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dobbs et al v. Farrell et al
as 3:2012cv05141
Plaintiff:
Angel Dobbs and Ashley Dobbs
Defendant:
David Farrell, Kelley Helleson and Steven McCraw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dobbs et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 4:2012cv01483
Plaintiff:
Annette Dobbs and Jesse Dobbs
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Katrinecz et al v. Dobbs-Stanford Corporation d/b/a GrandTec USA
as 1:2012cv00107
Plaintiff:
David Byrd and Andrew Katrinecz
Defendant:
Dobbs-Stanford Corporation d/b/a GrandTec USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Dobbs v. MRS BPO, LLC
as 4:2012cv00015
Plaintiff:
Linda Whatley Dobbs
Defendant:
MRS BPO, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Dobbs et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association
as 2:2011cv00321
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association
Plaintiff:
Walter Ray Dobbs and Lizbeth Dobbs
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
