Cases 61 - 70 of 183
Fogel v. Dept. Health & Human Services
as 1:2020cv00762
Defendant:
Dept. Health & Human Services
Plaintiff:
Mindy Fogel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nesbit v. Erickson et al
as 3:2020cv00710
Plaintiff:
Kevin Nesbit
Defendant:
Oregon Employment Dept Collections Unit, Oregon Employment Dept. and Kay Erickson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Freeman v. Schwartz et al
as 2:2020cv00602
Defendant:
D. Pedro, Stuart Young, Shannon Johnston and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Jeremy Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Oregon Dept. of Corrections et al
as 6:2020cv00564
Defendant:
C.O. Carbjhack, Oregon Dept. of Corrections, Colette Peters and others
Plaintiff:
Tariq Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Strub et al
as 6:2020cv00344
Defendant:
Marion County Sheriffs Dept., Michael Strub and Brian Danielson
Plaintiff:
Joshua Levi Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byers v. Martin et al
as 2:2020cv00319
Defendant:
Oregon Dept. of Corrections, Correctional Officer Surber, Sgt. Roberts and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Jerome Byers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horey v. Multnomah County Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 3:2020cv00301
Defendant:
Deputy DeJongh, State of Oregon, Multnomah County Detention Ctr and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Norman Horey, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keith v. Multnomah County Circuit Court et al
as 3:2020cv00283
Petitioner:
James David Keith
Respondent:
Judge Kelly Skye, Multnomah County Circuit Court and Inverness Jail Sheriff/Records Dept.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harris v. State of Oregon, et al et al
as 3:2020cv00163
Defendant:
ETAL, Multnomah County Sheriff's Dept., DHS and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Armand Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Oregon Dept. of Corrections et al
as 2:2020cv00139
Plaintiff:
Tariq Muhammad
Defendant:
C.O. VanDyke, Oregon Dept. of Corrections and Director Colette Peters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
