Cases 61 - 70 of 74
West v. United States of America et al
as 4:2012cv00315
Plaintiff:
Derrick West
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Bureau of Prisons, Unknown O'Donnell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Anaeme v. United States of America et al
as 2:2012cv00698
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C Anaeme
Defendant:
Amerco, U-Haul International Incorporated, U-Haul Self Storage Centers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Mincey v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2012cv00303
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio and Maricopa County Sheriff's Department
Plaintiff:
Torrance Derrick Mincey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCreary v. United States of America
as 2:2009cv01023
Petitioner:
Derrick L McCreary
Respondent:
United States of America and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Brown v. Lapkin et al
as 4:2009cv00235
Petitioner:
Derrick Lakeith Brown
Respondent:
Larry Lapkin and Craig Apker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brown v. Apker et al
as 4:2009cv00237
Petitioner:
Derrick Lakeith Brown
Defendant:
Craig Apker, S. Hollemback, Susan McClintock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Apker et al
as 4:2009cv00171
Petitioner:
Derrick Lakeith Brown
Respondent:
Craig Apker, McClintock, Hallombayk and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Booth v. Glendale, City of et al
as 2:2009cv00014
Plaintiff:
Jerrod Len B. B. Booth
Defendant:
Glendale, City of, Randy G. Adams, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brown v. Apker
as 4:2008cv00613
Petitioner:
Derrick Lakeith Brown
Respondent:
Craig Apker
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Brown v. Apker et al
as 4:2008cv00612
Petitioner:
Derrick Lakeith Brown
Respondent:
Craig Apker and Hallenbeck
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
