Cases 61 - 70 of 2,206
(PC) Espinoza v. Zepeda et al
as 1:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Espinoza
Defendant:
V. Zepeda, Dr. Edwin Gomer and CDCR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chien-Min Sung v. EHWA USA, Inc.
as 8:2024mc00006
Petitioner:
Dr. Chien-Min Sung
Respondent:
EHWA USA, Inc.
Amanda Wilde v. County of Orange et al
as 8:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Amanda Wilde
Defendant:
County of Orange, Orange County Social Services, Child Protective Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Michael A. Lujan v. Kevin Hixon et al
as 1:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Lujan
Defendant:
Kevin Hixon, Lee, Chiu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Satterwhite v. Baker et al
as 5:2024cv00699
Plaintiff:
DaCorey Satterwhite
Defendant:
Dr. Hyon Chu Yi Baker, Becket DiGregio, Dr. Michele Leblue Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Suran Thrift v. Michael V. Drake et al
as 2:2024cv01034
Plaintiff:
Suran Thrift
Defendant:
Michael V. Drake and Dr. David Rubin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Paschall v. Johal, et al.
as 1:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
Lamar Paschall
Defendant:
Amandeep Johal, Smith, Dr. Sinclair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
B&G Foods North America, Inc. v. Embry
as 2:2024mc00040
Plaintiff:
B&G Foods North America, Inc.
Defendant:
Kim Embry
Petitioner:
Dr. John Meeker
Card v. Alameda County District Attorney's Office
as 3:2024cv00444
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Card
Defendant:
Alameda County District Attorney's Office, Alameda County Public Defender's Office, Pamela Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis-Albrigo et al v. Motts, LLP et al
as 3:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Laura Willis-Albrigo and Tiffany Taylor
Defendant:
Motts, LLP and Keurig Dr. Pepper Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
