Cases 61 - 70 of 190
HUMMERT v. TICE et al
as 3:2021cv00047
Respondent:
ERIC TICE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DAVID W. SUNDAY, JR.
Petitioner:
BRIAN DAVID HUMMERT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WALLACE v. TICE et al
as 1:2021cv00340
Respondent:
The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania, Warden Eric Tice and Franklin County District Attorney
Petitioner:
Marcus L. Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LOWRY v. TICE et al
as 2:2021cv00083
Respondent:
ERIC TICE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and LAWRENCE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Petitioner:
SAMUEL LEE LOWRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WALLACE v. TICE et al
as 3:2021cv00007
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT ERIC TICE
Defendant:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
MARCUS L. WALLACE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
v. TICE et al
as 2:2020cv06287
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY LAWRENCE KRASNER, ESQ and SUPERINTENDENT ERIC TICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LATORRE v. KRASNER et al
as 2:2020cv06289
Respondent:
District Attorney LAWRENCE KRASNER, ESQ and SUPERINTENDENT ERIC TICE
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER LATORRE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SNIDER v. ALVAREZ et al
as 3:2020cv00241
Respondent:
Officer Heckert, C/O KILLEEN, Captain Eichenberg and others
Defendant:
ROBIN ALVAREZ and STEVENS
Plaintiff:
JOEL SNIDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Justin Hickox v. Eric Tice, et al
as 20-3185
Defendant / Appellee:
SETH ELLIS, DAN CARO, JEFFREY SHAFFER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUSTIN M. HICKOX
BECKHAM v. TICE et al
as 2:2020cv05398
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT ERIC TICE
Petitioner:
KEITH BECKHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DEWS v. TICE et al
as 2:2020cv05135
Respondent:
ERIC TICE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
DARRYL (WEST) DEWS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
