Cases 61 - 70 of 601
Jacobs v. Ikonics Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv08148
Plaintiff:
Stanley Jacobs
Defendant:
Ikonics Corporation, Glenn Sandgren, William C. Ulland and others
Grunewald v. Cohen et al
as 2:2021cv05031
Plaintiff:
Albert Grunewald
Defendant:
Dennis M. Cohen, Timothy D. Sini, John Ernest Raimondi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hernandez et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2021cv07406
Plaintiff:
Krystin Hernandez, Natalie Baker, Ethan Chiel and others
Defendant:
The City Of New York,, Mayor Bill De Blasio, NYPD Commissioner Dermot Shea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blankson v. ACMH, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04892
Defendant:
Santa Marie Rodriguez, ACMH, Inc., Ms. Nicole and others
Plaintiff:
Kobe Adjei Blankson
Debtor:
Emma L. Bowen Community Service Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04893
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Whitfield v. IKONICS Corp. et al
as 1:2021cv07010
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
IKONICS Corp., Bill Ulland, Glenn Sandgreen and others
Bendimez v. Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv04514
Plaintiff:
Alexis Bendimez
Defendant:
IKONICS Corporation, Bill Ulland, Glenn Sandgren and others
Stein v. Ikonics Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv06550
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
Ikonics Corporation, Bill Ulland, Glenn Sandgren and others
Blankson v. ACMH Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04114
Plaintiff:
Kobe Adjei Blankson
Defendant:
ACMH Inc., Well Life Network, Human Resource Administration Public Assistance Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 781 Forfeiture
Gaines v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceutical et al
as 1:2021cv05323
Defendant:
Ferrer, Poirot & Wansbrough, AstraZeneca Pharmaceutical and Howard L. Nations
Plaintiff:
Ernest Edward Gaines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
