Cases 61 - 70 of 111
Solliday v. Federal Bureau of Prisons Aliceville
as 7:2015cv00480
Plaintiff:
Myra Catherine Solliday
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons Aliceville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keene v. May et al
as 1:2015cv00077
Petitioner:
Billy Jack Keene
Respondent:
L. May, A. Speights and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Leigh v. John Doe #1 et al
as 1:2014cv01223
Plaintiff:
John S. Leigh
Defendant:
John Doe #1, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harley G Lappin and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gifford v. Rathman et al
as 1:2014cv01179
Defendant:
John Rathman, Federal Bureau of Prisons, The, Utilization Review Committee, The and others
Plaintiff:
James Brett Gifford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Federal Bureau of Prison FCI et al
as 7:2014cv01047
Plaintiff:
Juleen Brown
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prison FCI, B Loreno and Bance
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pilon v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 7:2014cv00979
Plaintiff:
Verna Pilon
Defendant:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons, Federal Correctional Institution Aliceville, Alabama, Ma at and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clemmons v. United States of America et al
as 2:2014cv00885
Plaintiff:
Sean Christopher Clemmons
Defendant:
United States of America and Federal Bureau of Prisons Officials
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCall v. United States of America et al
as 2:2014cv00475
Plaintiff:
Darron McCall
Defendant:
United States of America and Federal Bureau Of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Tio et al
as 1:2013cv01923
Plaintiff:
Arnold Lee Smith
Defendant:
Emilio Tio, John Rathman, Michael Blount and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Gordy et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2013cv00626
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Thomas
Defendant:
Christopher Gordy , U.S. Marshals Service, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
