Cases 61 - 70 of 357
PEARSON EDUCATION, INC. et al v. MOFIELD
as 2:2019cv04605
Defendant:
RAHEIM MOFIELD, DOES 1-3, JAMES REYNOLDS and others
Plaintiff:
PEARSON EDUCATION, INC., ELSEVIER, INC., CENAGE LEARNING, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
FREEMAN v. SAUL
as 2:2019cv04100
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY FREEMAN
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL and SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
FREEMAN v. ALLENTOWN SCHOOL DISTRICT
as 5:2019cv04336
Plaintiff:
DENISE FREEMAN
Defendant:
ALLENTOWN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv03052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
FREEMAN v. LINCOLN NATIONAL CORPORATION
as 2:2019cv01918
Plaintiff:
SHELLENE FREEMAN
Defendant:
LINCOLN NATIONAL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002
WOLFORD et al v. ALLEGHENY TECHNOLOGIES INC.
as 2:2019cv00251
Plaintiff:
VINCENT GEMINETTI, RICHARD FALETTI, WILLIAM R. SORG, JR. and others
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Freeman v. Hallmark Homes North, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00403
Plaintiff:
William Freeman
Defendant:
Francis Pedriani and Hallmark Homes North, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
FREEMAN v. ALLENTOWN SCHOOL DISTRICT
as 5:2018cv05093
Plaintiff:
DENISE FREEMAN
Defendant:
ALLENTOWN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
FREEMAN v. OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL (PENN) et al
as 2:2018cv02914
Defendant:
OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL (PENN), PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATT. OFFICE, MR. DAVID RANCHER and others
Plaintiff:
BARRY FREEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FREEMAN v. PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE et al
as 2:2018cv01031
Petitioner:
BARRY FREEMAN
Respondent:
PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE, OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, COMMONWEALTH OF PENN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
