Cases 61 - 70 of 218
Flusser v. Fifth Third Bancorp et al
as 1:2019cv00075
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Flusser
Defendant:
Fifth Third Bancorp and Fifth Third Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Troy Howards v. Fifth Third Bank
as 1:2018cv00869
Plaintiff:
Troy Howards
Defendant:
Fifth Third Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
United States of America v. $3,579.81 from Fifth Third Bank Account #xxxx0916, Held in the Name of Haya LLC, Dayton Pharmacy et al
as 3:2018cv00367
Defendant:
$3,579.81 from Fifth Third Bank Account #xxxx0916, Held in the Name of Haya LLC, Dayton Pharmacy and $3,976.61 from PNC Bank Checking Account #xxxx3064, Held in the Name of Brown MD & Associates LLC
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Ina Group, LLC. v. Patel et al
as 1:2018cv00733
Defendant:
Taraben N. Patel, Natubhai S. Patel, Denise Harrison and others
Plaintiff:
Ina Group, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Magee v. Fifth Third Bank
as 1:2018cv00722
Plaintiff:
LENOX MAGEE
Defendant:
Fifth Third Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Seldomridge v. Fifth Third Bank
as 1:2018cv00553
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Seldomridge
Defendant:
Fifth Third Bank
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Fifth Third Bank v. Smith
as 1:2018cv00493
Plaintiff:
Fifth Third Bank
Defendant:
John R Smith
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Fifth Third Bank v. Smith
as 1:2018oe00493
Plaintiff:
Fifth Third Bank
Defendant:
John R Smith
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Smith, et al v. Fifth Third Bank
as 1:2018cv00464
Plaintiff:
Carnell Smith
Defendant:
Fifth Third Bank
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Lenox Magee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carter v. Furmon et al
as 1:2018cv00400
Defendant:
Janel McBain, Commissioner Charles Furmon, John Paul Reiser and others
Plaintiff:
Orlando Carter, r
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
