Cases 61 - 70 of 155
Lapchynski et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as OHS/2:18-cv-00637
Plaintiff:
Douglas Lapchynski and Mary Foos
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Lapchynski et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00637
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mary Foos and Douglas Lapchynski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dustin Louie v. Foo, et al
as 18-35424
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DUSTIN A. LOUIE
Defendant - Appellee:
FOO, Correction Officer, BLIVEN, Sergeant and THOMAS W. FRANTS, Correction Officer
Kannenberg v. Foos et al
as 1:2018cv00359
Plaintiff:
Carl Kannenberg
Defendant:
Allison Foos, Diane Foos , Anthony Foos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ryokan College v. California Board of Psychology et al
as 2:2018cv00106
Defendant:
California Board of Psychology, Stephen Phillips, Nicole J. Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Ryokan College , Farnaz Samavi and Richard Leutenbacher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Ryokan College v. California Board of Psychology et al
as 2:2018at00047
Defendant:
California Board of Psychology, Stephen Phillips, Nicole J. Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Ryokan College
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv06878
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv05670
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446
Ryokan College v. California Board of Psychology et al
as 2:2017at00929
Plaintiff:
Ryokan College
Defendant:
California Board of Psychology, Stephen Phillips, Nicole J Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ryokan College v. California Board of Psychology et al
as 2:2017cv01882
Plaintiff:
Ryokan College
Defendant:
California Board of Psychology , Stephen Phillips , Nicole J Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
