Cases 61 - 70 of 175
FOWLER v STATE OF GEORGIA
as 5:2018cv00205
Plaintiff:
MARK ANTHONY FOWLER
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garvin v. City of Richmond Hill Police Dept et al
as 4:2018cv00109
Plaintiff:
Biron Garvin
Defendant:
City of Richmond Hill Police Dept, City of Richmond Hill, GA, Sykes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01585
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Swift Bey v. Deal et al
as 1:2018cv00906
Plaintiff:
Blaane Marco Swift Bey
Defendant:
Nathan Deal, Christopher M. Carr, Richard T. Hamil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bright v. Howell et al
as 1:2018cv00695
Plaintiff:
Roy Bright
Defendant:
Mike Howell, Kim Cadwell, Sean Fowler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dingler v. Milestone Mangagement et al
as 1:2017cv03992
Plaintiff:
Joseph Dingler
Defendant:
Milestone Mangagement, Kelly Jackson, Rivervista LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Fowler v. OSP Prevention Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv03911
Plaintiff:
Philip Fowler
Defendant:
OSP Prevention Group, Inc. and William E. Mabry, II
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
SOUTHERN MARSH COLLECTION LLC v SOUTHERN FOWLER COMPANY LLC
as 7:2017cv00157
Defendant:
SOUTHERN FOWLER COMPANY LLC
Plaintiff:
SOUTHERN MARSH COLLECTION LLC
Counter_claimant:
SOUTHERN FOWLER COMPANY LLC
Counter_defendant:
SOUTHERN MARSH COLLECTION LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stuart et al
as 1:2017cv00107
Plaintiff:
Frank Stuart , Jason Adams , Michael Barnes and others
Defendant:
Augusta-Richmond County, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Burrows v. Yeager et al
as 3:2017cv00110
Defendant:
Corporal Anthony Cox, Sergeant Eric Smith, Detention Officer Fowler and others
Plaintiff:
William Maurice Burrows
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
