Cases 61 - 70 of 85
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv01613
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Malak v. Chertoff et al
as 3:2007cv01523
Plaintiff:
Naser Abdel Malak
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Alberto Gonzales, Emilio Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Albofradi v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 1:2007mc00064
Petitioner:
Sabah Albofradi
Respondent:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Paul Clement, Michael Chertoff and others
Howard v. Enzer et al
as 3:2007cv01412
Plaintiff:
Michael Howard
Defendant:
Ethan Enzer, Michael Chertoff, Peter Keisler and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv01324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Choi v. Gonzales et al
as 6:2007cv06424
Petitioner:
OK Choi
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales, M. Frances Holmes, Emilio Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Encarnacion-Hernandez v. Holmes
as 1:2007cv00550
Petitioner:
Angel Encarnacion-Hernandez
Respondent:
M. Frances Holmes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fajardo-Calderon et al v. Gonzalez et al
as 3:2007cv01260
Plaintiff:
Richard Fajardo-Calderon, Miguel Fajardo-Calderon and Carolina Fajardo-Calderon
Defendant:
Emilio T. Gonzalez, Michael Chertoff, Alberto Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Luo et al v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007mc00065
Plaintiff:
Wei Luo and Qin Fan
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Paul E. Novak, Jr. and others
Kilic et al v. Homeland Security et al
as 3:2007cv01203
Plaintiff:
Osman Kilic and Zuhal Kilic
Defendant:
Homeland Security, Alberto Gonzales, Emilio Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
