Cases 61 - 70 of 591
Marvin Grimm, Jr. v. Gene Johnson
as 11-7332
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARVIN LEON GRIMM, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
GENE JOHNSON, Director VA. Dept. of Corrections
Douglas v. Johnson et al
as 7:2011cv00468
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, John Garman, Sgt. Chris Gilbert and others
Plaintiff:
Lamont O. Douglas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Johnson v. Linda Shear
as 11-7324
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
LINDA SHEAR, Food Service Director, Virginia Department of Corrections (VDOC), GENE JOHNSON, Director, VDOC, FRED SCHILLING, Health Services Director, VDOC and others
Johnson v. Astrue
as 3:2011cv50278
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Adam Gene Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Conrad Burke v. Gene Johnson
as 11-7206
Petitioner - Appellant:
CONRAD BURKE
Respondent - Appellee:
GENE JOHNSON, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections
Benjamin Fawley v. Gene Johnson
as 11-7147
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BENJAMIN WILLIAM FAWLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
GENE JOHNSON, Director, Department of Corrections, LARRY HUFFMAN, Western Regional Director, R.C. MATHENA, Warden, Keen Mountain Correctional Center and others
Defendant:
OTHER JANE AND JOHN DOE OFFICIALS AND STAFF
Canada v. Clarke et al
as 7:2011cv00408
Defendant:
Nurse Practioner Deborah Ball, C/O Grant Bledsoe, Lt. Blevins and others
Plaintiff:
Kelvin A. Canada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv01322
Plaintiff:
Gene Johnson
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and Thomas Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv03331
Plaintiff:
Gene Johnson
Defendant:
Thomas Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roosevelt Scott v. Gene Johnson
as 11-7092
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROOSEVELT SCOTT
Defendant - Appellee:
GENE JOHNSON, Director, EDDIE L. PEARSON, Warden, D. NEWCOMER, Captain C/O and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
