Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 107
CarParts.com, Inc. v. United States et al
as 1:2022cv00121
Plaintiff: CarParts.com, Inc.
Defendant: United States, President of U.S. Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Sec. of Commerce Gina M. Raimondo and others
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY v. U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00486
Plaintiff: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant: U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, MICHAEL REGAN, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 10 and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1540 Endangered Species Act
Halmos et al v. Spinard et al
as 4:2022cv10006
Plaintiff: Peter Halmos, International Yachting Charter Services and High Plains Capital Corporation
Defendant: Richard W. Spinard, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Gina M. Raimondo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Home Depot USA, Inc. v. United States et al
as 1:2022cv00014
Plaintiff: Home Depot USA, Inc.
Defendant: United States, President of U.S. Joseph R. Biden, Jr., United States Customs and Border Protection and others
Doe et al v. Austin, III et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2022cv00121
Plaintiff: John Doe and Jane Doe
Defendant: Lloyd J. Austin, III, Antony J. Blinken, Merrick B. Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01448
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SEAFREEZE SHORESIDE, INC. et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR et al
as 1:2021cv03276
Plaintiff: SEAFREEZE SHORESIDE, INC., LONG ISLAND COMMERCIAL FISHING ASSOC., INC., XIII NORTHEAST FISHERY SECTOR, INC. and others
Defendant: THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DEB HAALAND, THE BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT and others
Intervenor Defendant: VINEYARD WIND 1 LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Relentless Inc., et al v. US Dep't of Commerce, et al
as 21-1886
Plaintiff / Appellant: RELENTLESS, INC., HUNTRESS, INC. and SEAFREEZE FLEET LLC
Defendant / Appellee: US DEPT OF COMMERCE, WILBUR ROSS, in his official capacity as Secretary of Commerce, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION and others
District 4 Lodge of the International Association, et al v. Center for Biological Diversity, et al
as 21-1874
Plaintiff / Appellee: DISTRICT 4 LODGE OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS LOCAL LODGE 207, f/k/a IAMAW Maine Lobstering Union Local 207, DAMON FAMILY LOBSTER COMPANY, INC., FOX ISLAND LOBSTER COMPANY, LLC and others
Interested Party: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, MAINE LOBSTERMEN'S ASSOCIATION and LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL OF MAINE
Defendant / Appellant: CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION, INC. and DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE
Defendant: GINA M. RAIMONDO, in her official capacity as Secretary, United States Department of Commerce, JANET COIT, in her official capacity as Assistant Administrator, NOAA Fisheries and NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE
District 4 Lodge of the International Association, et al v. Raimondo, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-1873
Plaintiff / Appellee: DISTRICT 4 LODGE OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS LOCAL LODGE 207, f/k/a IAMAW Maine Lobstering Union Local 207, DAMON FAMILY LOBSTER COMPANY, INC., FOX ISLAND LOBSTER COMPANY, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellant: GINA M. RAIMONDO, in her official capacity as Secretary, United States Department of Commerce, JANET COIT, in her official capacity as Assistant Administrator, NOAA Fisheries and NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE
Interested Party: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION, INC. and DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE
Petitioner: MAINE LOBSTERMEN'S ASSOCIATION and LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL OF MAINE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?