Cases 61 - 70 of 79
Howe v. North Andover, The Town of et al
as 1:2010cv10116
Plaintiff:
Margaret Howe, Margaret Howe, A.H. and others
Defendant:
North Andover, The Town of, North Andover, The Town of, Mark F. Delaney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv30203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Default of Student Loan
Holly et al v. Kris et al
as 1:2009cv11848
Plaintiff:
Melvin Ellis Holly
Defendant:
Mooselence, Kris, Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Fan, M.D. v. Segal et al
as 1:2009cv11295
Plaintiff:
Lisha Fan, M.D.
Defendant:
David J. Segal, Deborah Toomey, Eun Sil Park and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv11186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Allison Graham v. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
as 1:2009cv10452
Plaintiff:
Allison Graham
Defendant:
Department of Housing and Urban Development
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Graham v. Sabol
as 4:2008cv40208
Petitioner:
Emmett Madison Graham, Jr.
Respondent:
Carolyn A. Sabol
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Karim et al v. Melican et al
as 1:2008cv11307
Plaintiff:
Ann Karim and Musa Karim
Defendant:
Paul Melican, Melvin Graham and Deyon Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Nelson v. Patnaude et al
as 4:2008cv40118
Plaintiff:
Darin Nelson and Darin Nelson
Defendant:
Thomas Patnaude, Philip Wood, Keith Roberge and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Graham v. United States of America et al
as 4:2008cv40113
Plaintiff:
Emmett Madison Graham
Defendant:
United States of America and Carolyn A. Sabol
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
