Cases 61 - 70 of 89
Gibbs v. STATE OF MARYLAND
as 1:2011cv02273
Respondent:
STATE OF MARYLAND
Petitioner:
Gilbert Gibbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. L&J Group, LLC et al
as 8:2011cv01255
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
L&J Group, LLC, Gilbert Eugene Lunsford, Rhonda M. Lunsford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Missouri v. Preston et al
as 8:2011cv01080
Plaintiff:
Joseph Gilbert Missouri
Defendant:
Judy Preston, Rachel Queen, Martin O'Malley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilbert Foods, Inc. v. State Automobile Mutual Insurance Co., Inc.
as 1:2011cv00295
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Foods, Inc.
Defendant:
State Automobile Mutual Insurance Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evans v. Sapperstein
as 1:2010cv03544
Plaintiff:
Edna Evans
Defendant:
Gilbert Sapperstein
Counter_claimant:
Gilbert Sapperstein
Counter_defendant:
Edna Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01946
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gilbert, Jr. v. Bangs
as 8:2010cv01440
Plaintiff:
Charles Richard Alsop Gilbert, Jr.
Defendant:
David Bangs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Perry v. Dow Chemical Co. et al
as 1:2010cv01093
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Perry
Defendant:
Dow Chemical Co., Monsanto Co. and Twenty other firms Name in the original Suit May 7, 1984 Agent Orange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sindram v. City of Takoma Park Police Department et al
as 8:2010cv00681
Plaintiff:
Michael Sindram
Defendant:
City of Takoma Park Police Department, K. Gilbert, Godelewski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Protection One Alarm Monitoring, Inc. v. L and J Group et al
as 8:2009cv03424
Plaintiff:
Protection One Alarm Monitoring, Inc.
Defendant:
L and J Group, Gilbert Eugene Lunsford, Rhonda Michelle Lunsford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
