Cases 61 - 70 of 345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02837
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
BARRION v. SMITH et al
as 5:2021cv00230
Plaintiff:
GREGORY D BARRION
Defendant:
HEAD WARDEN SMITH, DEPUTY WARDEN CHANEY, DEPUTY WARDEN KING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. Wilcher
as 4:2021cv00221
Plaintiff:
Napoleon Ramon Graham
Defendant:
Sheriff John Wilcher and Chatham County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAHAM v. THOMAS COUNTY JAIL
as 7:2021cv00077
Defendant:
THOMAS COUNTY JAIL
Plaintiff:
MAKEITH F GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEGRIN v. KING et al
as 5:2021cv00269
Plaintiff:
ERIC M NEGRIN
Defendant:
Captain BUSTER KING, LIEUTENANT ENRIQUE MARCUS, NURSE TINA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coalition for Good Governance et al v. Raffensperger et al
as 1:2021cv02070
Plaintiff:
Georgia Advancing Progress Political Action Committee, Ryan Graham, Patricia Pullar and others
Defendant:
Brad Raffensperger, Anh Le, Rebecca N. Sullivan and others
Amicus Curiae:
Georgia First Amendment Foundation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diarra v. Maddox et al
as 1:2021cv01919
Defendant:
Randy Akies, Lieutenant Graham, Melody M. Maddox and others
Plaintiff:
Moussa Diarra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OUTLER v. STATE OF GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al.
as 1:2021cv00049
Defendant:
Ofc Taraus Grimsley, Ofc Timothy Davis, WARDEN TAMARSHE SMITH and others
Plaintiff:
Angel Manuel Ortiz and SANDRA OUTLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. Chatham County Sheriff Department et al
as 4:2021cv00128
Defendant:
Cpl Petiote and Chatham County Sheriff Department
Plaintiff:
Napoleon Ramon Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc.
as 1:2021cv01000
Plaintiff:
Contina Graham
Defendant:
Publix Supermarkets, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
