Cases 61 - 70 of 106
Williams v. City of South St. Paul et al
as 0:2014cv04274
Plaintiff:
Sherrie A. Williams
Defendant:
City of South St. Paul , David Hughes , Colleen Myhre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grant v. National Football League et al
as 0:2014cv03815
Plaintiff:
Darryl Grant
Defendant:
National Football League, NFL Films, Inc. and NFL Productions, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Grant v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
as 0:2014cv03427
Plaintiff:
Judith Grant
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics, Stryker Corp., Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hernandez-Rivera v. Gunderson et al
as 0:2014cv01028
Plaintiff:
Victor Yair Hernandez-Rivera
Defendant:
Justin Gunderson , Erin Reski , Kyle Eckert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sherno v. Anoka County et al
as 0:2014cv00982
Defendant:
Anoka County , City of Apple Valley , City of Arlington and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wallace Sherno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Taylor v. City of Amboy et al
as 0:2014cv00722
Defendant:
City of Amboy, City of Bloomington, Blue Earth County and others
Plaintiff:
Jared Michael Grant Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nielsen v. Grant, City of et al
as 0:2013cv03543
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Lynn Nielsen
Respondent:
Grant, City of , William M. Hutton , Washington County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nyhus v. City of Blaine et al
as 0:2013cv02878
Defendant:
City of Blaine , City of Bloomington , City of Brainerd and others
Plaintiff:
Natalie Ann Nyhus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kampschroer et al v. Anoka County et al
as 0:2013cv02512
Defendant:
Anoka County , City of Anoka, City of Apple Valley and others
Plaintiff:
Jessica Leah Kampschroer and Cory Patrick Kampschroer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2013cv01222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
