Cases 61 - 70 of 3,355
Benton v. BBBB Bonding Corp., et al
as 2:2024cv01294
Plaintiff:
Michael Benton
Defendant:
BBBB Bonding Corporation, Clifford Jeffery Stanley and Robert Hill-Venn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Hill v. Brigitte et al
as 4:2024cv02436
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon V. Hill
Defendant:
Brigitte, Yolanda and Kumar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Sean Paul et al
as 2:2024cv03602
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Defendant:
Sean Paul, Troy Donald Jamerson, Ho Chi Mihn City and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Benton v. BBBB Bonding Corp., et al
as 2:2024at00562
Plaintiff:
Michael Benton
Defendant:
BBBB Bonding Corporation, Clifford Jeffery Stanley and Robert Hill-Venn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02617
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Johnson v. Boreago et al
as 3:2024cv00494
Plaintiff:
Corey Ray Johnson
Defendant:
Boreago, L. Rodriguez, James Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hung Duong Nguon v. James S. Hill et al
as 2:2024cv02297
Petitioner:
Hung Duong Nguon
Respondent:
James S Hill and Xavier Becerra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hung Duong Nguon v. James S. Hill
as 2:2024cv02561
Petitioner:
Hung Duong Nguon
Respondent:
James S. Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robert Hills v. Thomas Wallin et al
as 2:2024cv02837
Plaintiff:
Robert Hills
Defendant:
Thomas Wallin, Roselynn Wallin, Austin Gutierrez and others
Essex Bunker Hill, LP v. Ariel Lanae Dillard
as 2:2024cv02931
Plaintiff:
Essex Bunker Hill, LP
Defendant:
Ariel Lanae Dillard
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
