Cases 61 - 70 of 70
Smith v. Coplan et al
as 6:2010cv00116
Plaintiff:
Mitchell A. Smith
Defendant:
Howell Coplan and Butler Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thornton v. Quicksilver Resources Inc et al
as 5:2009cv01218
Plaintiff:
Rodney D Thornton
Defendant:
Quicksilver Resources Inc, Jeff Cook, Kieran D Maye, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Howell v. Walls et al
as 5:2009cv00645
Plaintiff:
Darren Alan Howell
Defendant:
Jerry Walls, Dennis Garza, Chad Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Howell et al
as 6:2009cv00137
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Darrill Glenn Howell, Verne Jean Howell, Bank of America and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Howell v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh Pennsylvania et al
as 5:2009cv00150
Plaintiff:
William Keith Howell, William Keith Howell and William Keith Howell
Defendant:
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh Pennsylvania and John Doe
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Howell v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh Pennsylvania et al
as 5:2009cv00013
Plaintiff:
William Keith Howell
Defendant:
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh Pennsylvania and American International Group Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Howell v. USA
as 6:2008cv00238
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Pamela Raye Howell
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Russell v. Alorica, Inc.
as 4:2008cv00194
Plaintiff:
Lateisha Taylor, Melissa Castro, Cindy Miller and others
Defendant:
Alorica, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Howell v. Winchester et al
as 5:2007cv01443
Plaintiff:
David W Howell
Defendant:
Bill Winchester and John Doe Vonhagel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howell v. Sirmons
as 5:2007cv01008
Petitioner:
Michael Wayne Howell
Respondent:
Marty Sirmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
