Cases 61 - 70 of 253
Heath v. Abbott et al
as 2:2022cv00257
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Greg Abbott, Paul Ballard, David Ballard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00558
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Heath v. Abbott et al
as 7:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Greg Abbott, Paul Ballard, David Ballard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herndon v. Houston Federal Credit Union et al
as 4:2022cv01868
Plaintiff:
Jacob Rea'shaw Herndon
Defendant:
Houston Federal Credit Union, Chase Bank, Experian and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Heath v. Jeff et al
as 5:2022cv00063
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Lee Jeff, Ronald Page and David Davidison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Office of the Attorney General of Texas v. Burns
as 4:2022cv00428
Plaintiff:
Office of the Attorney General of Texas
Defendant:
Michael Heath Burns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Heath v. Wilson et al
as 5:2022cv00060
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Amber Wilson, Mike Davidson and James Young, .
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heath v. Jeff et al
as 5:2022cv00057
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Lee Jeff, David Davidison, Mike Davidison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heath v. Wilson et al
as 4:2022cv00401
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Amber Wilson, Mike Davidson and James Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heath v. Jeff et al
as 7:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Lee Jeff, David Davidison, Mike Davidison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
