Cases 61 - 70 of 454
Pierre-Gilles v. Akima Global Services, LLC
as 1:2021cv20716
Defendant:
Akima Global Services, LLC, Michael W. Meade, Larry Niedziakeck and others
Plaintiff:
Herby Yves Pierre-Giles and Herby Yves Pierre-Gilles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv02362
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Llamas et al v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 6:2020cv02264
Defendant:
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S. Department of Energy and others
Plaintiff:
Noelle Llamas and Ken Klippenstein
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00562
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv24926
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv10130
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bogomazov v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2020cv24482
Defendant:
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Ralph Angulo, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff:
Vitaly Vladimirovich Bogomazov
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv24462
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Serrano Naranjo v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 0:2020cv62192
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney General and Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Plaintiff:
Daniley Serrano Naranjo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv24382
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
