Cases 61 - 70 of 105
v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. et al
as 2:2015at00710
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., National Default Servicing Corporation, The Bank of New York Mellon FKA The Bank of New York as Trustee for the Certificateholders of the CWABS, Inc., Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2005-IM-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Decton Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. et al
as 8:2015cv00661
Defendant:
DOES, National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. and New Hampshire Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Decton Inc.
Unknown:
Tae J Im
Sommers v. Silva et al
as 3:2015cv01688
Plaintiff:
Ross Ivan Sommers
Defendant:
D. Silva, M. E. Spearman, Im and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sommers v. Im et al
as 3:2015cv01047
Plaintiff:
Ross Ivan Sommers
Defendant:
J. Im, P. Santiago and D. Silva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chanel, Inc. v. Grace Jewelry et al
as 2:2014cv07795
Defendant:
Bellissima Accessory, Parsih Demirjian, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Fredger Alexander et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2014cv05645
Plaintiff:
Christopher Landry, Timothy Stack, Ronald Cade and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Steven Pearl
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Supafly Entertainment, Inc. v. IM Music, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv04163
Defendant:
IM Music, Inc., Margo Simms and Londell Smith
Plaintiff:
Supafly Entertainment, Inc.
Supafly Entertainment, Inc. v. IM Music, Inc. et al
as 2:2014mc00283
Defendant:
IM Music, Inc., Margo Simms and Londell Smith
Plaintiff:
Supafly Entertainment, Inc.
Charter School Capital Inc v. Charter Asset Management Fund LP et al
as 2:2014cv03385
Defendant:
Charter Asset Management Fund LP, Paul Im and David Park
Plaintiff:
Charter School Capital Inc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00624
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
