Cases 61 - 70 of 106
Chisholm v. United States Of America et al
as 4:2017cv00211
Plaintiff:
Vivian F Chisholm
Defendant:
United States Navy, Lancelot Chester Coley, Richard Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Cole v. Goings et al
as 4:2016cv02725
Plaintiff:
Devin Paul Cole
Defendant:
Warden Reginald Goings, Assistant Warden Hutchison, Brad Livingston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNeal v. Executive Director, TDCJ-CID et al
as 6:2016cv01117
Plaintiff:
William C McNeal
Defendant:
Executive Director, TDCJ-CID, Edgar D Baker, Jr, Larry E Berger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. McKillip, et al
as 1:2016cv00114
Plaintiff:
James D Davis
Defendant:
FNU McKillip, FNU Snodgrass, FNU McQuade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Livingston et al
as 6:2016cv00242
Plaintiff:
Artavias T Edwards
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Bennie J Coleman, Rebecca A Warren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cain v. Norsworthy et al
as 1:2016cv00061
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Neal Cain
Defendant:
Christopher Norsworthy, L Lavis, Oliver J Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oliver v. United States Congress et al
as 4:2015cv02525
Plaintiff:
Ellery Oliver
Defendant:
United States Congress, United States District Court (Southern Dist.), Texas Government and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hendrix v. Stephens
as 4:2015cv01844
Plaintiff:
Jason Ray Hendrix
Defendant:
William Stephens, Strong, Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saunders v. Ipock et al
as 4:2015cv01747
Plaintiff:
Jonathan P. Saunders
Defendant:
Brady Ipock, The Office of Inspector General and Christy L. Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Saunders v. Ipock et al
as 4:2015mc01542
Plaintiff:
Jonathan P. Saunders
Defendant:
Brady Ipock, The Office of the Inspector General and Christy L. Bonilla
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
