Cases 61 - 70 of 76
Tufono v. Riddle et al
as 5:2010cv04691
Plaintiff:
Arvello L. Tufono
Defendant:
B Riddle, J. Garcia, M. Huerta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Davis et al
as 1:2010cv02356
Petitioner:
Shawn P. Williams
Respondent:
Blake R. Davis, T. R. Krist, K. Duling and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Santos Castillo-Mejia v. Secretary, FL DOC, et al
as 10-14178
Petitioner - Appellant:
SANTOS J. CASTILLO-MEJIA
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Robert Garcia v. M. Lunes, et al
as 10-15944
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT JOSEPH GARCIA
Defendant - Appellee:
M. LUNES, Correctional Officer, A. DIAZ, Correctional Lieutenant, M. M. MILLER, Correctional Lieutenant and others
Castillo vs Solano County Jail, et al
as 2:2009cv00341
Plaintiff:
Reynaldo J. Castillo
Defendant:
Solano County Jail, Barrileaux, Senesackda and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01990
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Castillo v. Roche Laboratories, Inc.
as 1:2008cv22301
Plaintiff:
William J. Castillo
Defendant:
Roche Laboratories, Inc. and Roche Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Richards et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2008cv00488
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Richards and Curtis Richards
Defendant:
The City of New York, Francisco J. Castillo and John Doe
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Castillo-Mejia v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2007cv01585
Petitioner:
Santos J. Castillo-Mejia
Respondent:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Haney v. Bondoc et al
as 1:2007cv01222
Plaintiff:
Monte Haney
Defendant:
J. Bondoc, E. Garnett, Yasuda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
