Cases 61 - 70 of 365
McDonald et al v. Justice et al
as 5:2016cv09952
Plaintiff:
Howard McDonald, Nicholas C. Dove, Chad Cline and others
Defendant:
Jim Justice , Jay Justice , Dynamic Energy and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2101
Nobles et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv09082
Plaintiff:
DiAnn Nobles and Jim Nobles, Jr.
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Weldon v. Hodge et al
as 3:2016cv07887
Plaintiff:
Monique Nicole Weldon
Defendant:
Hodge, Cathy Rollins, Shelby Searls and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Rubenstein et al
as 2:2016cv05637
Plaintiff:
Andre Miller
Defendant:
Jim Rubenstein, David Ballard, Christopher Wynegar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harding v. Rubenstein et al
as 1:2016cv00173
Plaintiff:
Smitty Harding
Defendant:
Jim Rubenstein, Karen Pszczolkowski, Cecelia Janiszewski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Rubenstein et al
as 2:2016cv05638
Plaintiff:
Andre Miller
Defendant:
Jim Rubenstein , David Ballard , Anthony Kidd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. State of West Virginia et al
as 3:2016cv00116
Plaintiff:
Alex Hamilton
Defendant:
State of West Virginia, West Virginia Division Of Corrections, Salem Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDaniel et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv05959
Plaintiff:
Bonnie J. McDaniel and Jim McDaniel
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Browning v. Pszczolkowski et al
as 1:2016cv00145
Plaintiff:
Jason Browning
Defendant:
Karen Pszczolkowski, Jim Rubenstein, William Yurcina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LaRue v. Rubenstein et al
as 2:2016cv05853
Plaintiff:
William Allen LaRue
Defendant:
Jim Rubenstein, Correctional Medical Services and Wexford Health Sources Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
