Cases 61 - 70 of 106
Abernathy v. Dewey et al
as 1:2015cv10431
Plaintiff:
Franklin B. Abernathy
Defendant:
Shawn Dewey, John Doe #1, Michael Rumery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace et al v. Cousins et al
as 1:2014cv14767
Plaintiff:
Willie Wallace
Defendant:
Frank Cousins, Michael Marks, Heath Carafa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ahmed v. Facebook, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv10026
Plaintiff:
Naeem Ahmed
Defendant:
Facebook, Inc. , John Doe, John Doe, 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Ahmed v. Twitter, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv10025
Plaintiff:
Naeem Ahmed
Defendant:
Twitter, Inc. , John Doe , John Doe, 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Pappargeris v. MHM Correctional Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv13049
Plaintiff:
A. George Pappargeris
Defendant:
MHM Correctional Services, Inc. , Kate Irwin , Jean Bradanick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McGrath et al v. Town of Sandwich, et al
as 1:2013cv12381
Plaintiff:
Ty C McGrath and Julianne McGrath
Defendant:
Town of Sandwich, Brian A Bondarek, Christa L Cabral and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris et al v. Norris et al
as 1:2013cv12275
Plaintiff:
Paula Harris , Michael Harris and Seanna Harris
Defendant:
Timothy Norris , John Doe #1 and John Doe #2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. City of Worcester et al
as 4:2013cv40064
Plaintiff:
Jerome E. Smith
Defendant:
City of Worcester, Gary J. Gemme, Terrence Cahill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smitherman v. Stevenson et al
as 1:2013cv10161
Plaintiff:
Harold Smitherman
Defendant:
Anthony J. Stevenson, Matthew M. Wisnewski, Matthew Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flanagan v. Marriott International, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv12046
Plaintiff:
Donald B. Flanagan, Jr.
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
