Cases 61 - 70 of 209
Felton Love, Jr. v. Jeff Macomber, et al
as 23-15748
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FELTON LOVE, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFF MACOMBER, Warden, KATHLEEN ALLISON, TRACY JOHNSON and others
(HC) Buckley v. Macomber
as 1:2023cv00630
Petitioner:
Kenneth Buckley
Respondent:
Jeff Macomber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lopez Sanchez V. CDCR, et al.,
as 2:2023cv01011
Plaintiff:
Margarita Lopez Sanchez
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, California State Prison, Sacramento, Jeff Macomber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
(PC) Contreras v. Macomber, et al.,
as 2:2023at00505
Plaintiff:
Ramon Contreras
Defendant:
Jeff Macomber and Kathleen Allison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Myers v. Phillips et al
as 1:2023cv00409
Petitioner:
Anthony James Myers
Respondent:
Bryan D. Phillips and Jeff Macomber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brian Hernandez v. Jeff Macomber
as 5:2023cv00635
Petitioner:
Brian Hernandez
Respondent:
Jeff Macomber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Love v. Macomber et al
as 2:2023at00391
Defendant:
Jeff Macomber and Felton Love, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hill v. Newsom et al
as 4:2023cv01997
Plaintiff:
Nathan Hill
Defendant:
Governor Gavin Newsom, State of California, Jeff Macomber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Thompkins v. Martinez et al
as 2:2023cv00449
Petitioner:
Raymond Thompkins
Respondent:
Jeff Macomber and Luis Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Brown v. Macomber
as 1:2023cv00221
Petitioner:
Shawn Lamont Brown
Respondent:
Jeff Macomber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
