Cases 61 - 70 of 189
Ives v. Reddish et al
as 3:2019cv00827
Defendant:
Thompson, John Doe #5, John Doe #4 and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick W. Ives
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOUIS DEL FAVERO ORCHIDS INC v. RIVKEES et al
as 4:2019cv00284
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #5, Christian Bax, JOHN DOE #4 and others
Plaintiff:
Louis Del Favero Orchids, Inc. and LOUIS DEL FAVERO ORCHIDS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Parks v. Corizon, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00631
Defendant:
E. Perez-Lugo, Erron Campbell, Corizon, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Parks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Borroto v. Lees et al
as 6:2019cv00851
Defendant:
John Doe 9, Peter Crank, Lees Eid and others
Plaintiff:
Ramon Armas Borroto, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JULIAN v. INCH et al
as 4:2019cv00148
Defendant:
MARK INCH, JOHN DOE - 2, MS HELMS and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH JULIAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allgood v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv21095
Defendant:
John Doe # 5, Sgt Moss, John Doe # 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Dean Allgood, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEATON v. JONES et al
as 4:2019cv00025
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #5, TARLOS THOMAS, TIMOTHY R NOLES and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JAMES KEATON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez v. PTS of America, LLC et al
as 0:2018cv62681
Plaintiff:
Luis Hernandez
Defendant:
PTS of America, LLC, Prisoner Transportation Services, LLC, John Doe #5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stone et al v. Keisei Electric Railway Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv24040
Defendant:
Tsudanuma Central General Hospital, Yoshiharu Yano, U.S. Department of State and others
Plaintiff:
Jack Stone and Miyuki Suzuki
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Milledge v. Willis et al
as 2:2018cv00413
Plaintiff:
Corey L. Milledge
Defendant:
J. Willis, Kara Williams, FNU Barrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
