Cases 61 - 70 of 127
LEWINS v. COLLINS et al
as 1:2016cv02759
Defendant:
PATRICK COLLINS, JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Plaintiff:
MARQUIS LEWINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kent et al v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2016cv00101
Plaintiff:
Alvin D Kent and Patricia Kent
Defendant:
Biomet Inc , Biomet Orthopedics LLC , Biomet Manufacturing LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STUDY v. MEYER et al
as 2:2015cv00101
Plaintiff:
JOHN STUDY
Defendant:
TODD J. MEYER, KEN CAMPBELL, MATTHEW C. KINCAID and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00535
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
HEAVRIN v. KENT et al
as 1:2015cv02016
Defendant:
ROBERT BUGHER, C KENT, R LAYMAN and others
Plaintiff:
JERAMY L HEAVRIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heavrin v. Kent et al
as 3:2015cv00598
Plaintiff:
Jeramy L Heavrin
Defendant:
C Kent, R Layman, Brian Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MIDWEST PAIN INSTITUTE CENTER FOR MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINE, P.C. v. REMLEY
as 1:2015cv01891
Plaintiff:
MIDWEST PAIN INSTITUTE CENTER FOR MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINE, P.C.
Defendant:
KENT B. REMLEY, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
EWING v. AMERIANA BANCORP et al
as 1:2015cv01491
Defendant:
AMERIANA BANCORP, MICHAEL E. BOSWAY, JENNIFER P. BOTT and others
Plaintiff:
DARRELL F. EWING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
KENT v. NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, INC.
as 4:2015cv00103
Plaintiff:
MARK KENT
Defendant:
NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00722
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
