Cases 61 - 70 of 1,789
Hale v. Kelly et al
as 1:2023cv16923
Plaintiff:
Ray E Hale
Defendant:
Mike Kelly and Will County Adult Dention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. EssilorLuxottica, S.A. et al
as 1:2023cv15176
Plaintiff:
Kelly Brown and Nedenia Udovich
Defendant:
EssilorLuxottica, S.A., Luxottica Group S.p.A., Essilor International SAS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Encarnacion v. Szul et al
as 1:2023cv16268
Plaintiff:
Xavier Encarnacion
Defendant:
Szul, Lombardi, Danner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Orland Park Police Dept. et al
as 1:2023cv15083
Plaintiff:
Rodney Miller
Defendant:
Orland Park Police Dept., Unknown LT.S, Sgt. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boykin v. Kelly et al
as 1:2023cv15009
Plaintiff:
Bernell M. Boykin
Defendant:
Mike Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Courney v. Wills et al
as 3:2023cv03788
Plaintiff:
Jaleel Courney
Defendant:
Anothy Wills, La'Toya Hughes, Kelly Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wise v. Winnebago County Sherriff
as 3:2023cv50364
Plaintiff:
Stacey Wise
Defendant:
Winnebago County Sherriff, Gary Caruana, Robert Redmond and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03629
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA: Family and Medical Leave Act (Findings and Purposes)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv14682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Stokes v. Will County Adult Detention Center et al
as 1:2023cv15102
Plaintiff:
Darwin L Stokes
Defendant:
Will County Adult Detention Center and Mike Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
