Cases 61 - 70 of 72
Myers v. Mississippi Windstorm Underwriting Association et al
as 1:2009cv00500
Plaintiff:
Kevin Myers
Defendant:
Mississippi Windstorm Underwriting Association, Audubon Insurance Company, Inc. and John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Augustine et al v. Mississippi Windstorm Underwriting Association et al
as 1:2009cv00316
Plaintiff:
Anthony Augustine, Kimberly Augustine, Frank Bridges and others
Defendant:
Mississippi Windstorm Underwriting Association and Audubon Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv02212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
In re: In Re: Jerry Dickerson
as 08-6016
Movant:
In re: JERRY W. DICKERSON
Respondent:
KEVIN MYERS, Warden
Arthur Campbell v. Kevin Myers
as 08-5037
Petitioner - Appellant:
ARTHUR JACOB CAMPBELL
Respondent - Appellee:
KEVIN MYERS
Edward Pinchon v. Kevin Myers
as 07-6496
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDWARD PINCHON
Respondent - Appellee:
KEVIN MYERS, Warden, Warden
Simpkins v. Correction Corporation of America et al
as 3:2007cv00948
Plaintiff:
Andrew Simpkins
Defendant:
Correction Corporation of America, Kevin Myers, (f/n/u) Gants and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpkins v. Correction Corporation of America et al
as 3:2007mc00104
Plaintiff:
Andrew Simpkins
Defendant:
Correction Corporation of America, Kevin Myers, (f/n/u) Gants and others
Henderson v. Lindamood et al
as 1:2007cv00055
Plaintiff:
Henry Henderson
Defendant:
Cherry Lindamood, Steve Dotson, Roland D. Colson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flannigan v. Parker
as 2:2005cv02269
Plaintiff:
Paul Flannigan
Defendant:
Kevin Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
