Cases 61 - 70 of 2,544
Barnes v. Tulsa Police Department et al
as 4:2023cv00288
Defendant:
B Keener, J Faircloth, Tulsa Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Dario Perez Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poe et al v. Drummond et al
as 4:2023cv00177
Plaintiff:
Peter Poe, Paula Poe, Patrick Poe and others
Defendant:
Gentner Drummond, Steven Katsis, Trevor Nutt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garrett v. Anderson et al
as 6:2023cv00223
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Marvin Garrett
Defendant:
Jennifer M. Anderson, Errol R. Arthur, Julie Becker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Royal v. Emerson-Gomez et al
as 5:2023cv00468
Plaintiff:
Tony Royal
Defendant:
Mary Emerson-Gomez and Edward L Gaylord
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ojeda v Social Security Administration
as 4:2023cv00215
Plaintiff:
Chelsea L Ojeda
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
L Rothschild Express Trust v. Washington State of
as 5:2023cv00465
Respondent:
Washington State of
Claimant:
L Rothschild Express Trust and Dominick Wernicke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jackson v. Rankins
as 5:2023cv00439
Petitioner:
David L Jackson
Respondent:
William Chris Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kirby v. USA
as 5:2023cv00487
Petitioner:
Clay L Kirby
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Mayes v. Buss
as 4:2023cv00176
Petitioner:
Lawrence Mayes and Lawrence L Mayes
Respondent:
Janet Dowling and David Buss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams et al v. Johnson et al
as 6:2023cv00210
Plaintiff:
Brandy Williams and James Williams
Defendant:
Robert L. Johnson, LCJ Logistics, Inc, Amazon.com, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
