Cases 61 - 70 of 101
JOHNSON v. CITY OF CAMDEN COUNTY NEW JERESEY
as 1:2016cv06225
Plaintiff:
TYREE LAMAR JOHNSON
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN COUNTY NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALEXANDER v. CITY OF ENGLEWOOD et al
as 2:2016cv04599
Plaintiff:
LAMAR ALEXANDER
Defendant:
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD and CITY OF ENGLEWOOD POLICE OFFICERS JOHN DOE/JANE DOE 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUCKABY v. BRADLEY et al.
as 1:2016cv04327
Plaintiff:
LANNY SCOTT HUCKABY
Defendant:
PAUL E. BRADLEY, DEXTER ISAIAH CHRONIS, ANTONIO CORTEZ DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ANGLIN v. ANGLIN
as 2:2016cv04049
Defendant:
ROBERT MATTHEW ANGLIN, EMILY MELLOW, EDWIN LEAVITT-GRUBERGER and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH LAMAR ANGLIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MULLINAX et al v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv03291
Plaintiff:
WILLIE LAMAR MULLINAX and JUNE MULLINAX
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BURNO v. PACIFIC MARKETING, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv02941
Plaintiff:
LAMAR BURNO
Defendant:
PACIFIC MARKETING, INC., ENDO SURGICAL CENTER OF GREATER LAKES, MICHAEL ANGELO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN v. ELIZABETH CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2016cv02119
Plaintiff:
ALPHONSO B. BROWN
Defendant:
ELIZABETH CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, PATRICK SHANNON, JAMES MALONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TILLMAN v. JOHN DOE et al
as 1:2016cv01688
Plaintiff:
MARVIN TILLMAN
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, WARDEN KIRBY, WATKIN-WARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAMUELS v. HEALTH DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2016cv01289
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN LAMAR SAMUELS
Defendant:
HEALTH DEPARTMENT, BURLINGTON COUNTY FREEHOLDERS and SHULTZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUBOSE v. CAMDEN CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 1:2015cv07817
Plaintiff:
LAMAR DUBOSE
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
