Cases 61 - 70 of 268
Williams v. City of Baton Rouge et al
as 3:2020cv00162
Defendant:
John Doe Officers from The City of Baton Rouge, Jerry Miller, Hillar Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Archie Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Sanders et al
as 3:2020cv00040
Defendant:
Tim Delaney, Nicholas Sanders and John/Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
JerXavier L. Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bates v. Normand
as 1:2020cv00036
Plaintiff:
McKinley Bates, III
Defendant:
Lane Normand
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv14387
Defendant:
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. f/k/a Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories Ltd., Hospira, Inc., Sanofi US Services Inc. f/k/a Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lane v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv14365
Defendant:
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc., Sun Pharma Global FZE, Hospira, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Katrina Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spikes v. Elayn Hunt Correctional Center et al
as 3:2019cv00713
Defendant:
Major Lane, Elayn Hunt Correctional Center, Eric Lane and others
Plaintiff:
Jason J Spikes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spikes v. Elayn Hunt Correctional Center et al
as 2:2019cv12253
Defendant:
Major Lane and Elayn Hunt Correctional Center
Plaintiff:
Jason J Spikes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mcdowell v. Our Lady of the Lake et al
as 3:2019cv00569
Defendant:
Susan Dixon, Our Lady of the Lake, Lane Regional Medical Center and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald Mcdowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
McDuffy-Johnson v. Lane et al
as 5:2019cv01193
Defendant:
Bubba, Sunny and Daniel A Lane, III
Plaintiff:
Julia Louise McDuffy-Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lane v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv12413
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Sanofi US Services Inc.
Plaintiff:
Audrey Young Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
