Cases 61 - 70 of 638
CAMPBELL v. POWERS, KIRN & JAVARDIAN, LLC et al
as 5:2018cv03825
Defendant:
PHELAN HALLINAN DIAMOND AND JONES, PLLC, POWERS, KIRN & JAVARDIAN, LLC and U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Plaintiff:
LEROY CAMPBELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FRAZIER v. WILLIAMS
as 1:2018cv00247
Petitioner:
LEROY FRAZIER
Respondent:
MARK K. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv03456
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
DADE v. COPOZZA et al
as 2:2018cv03411
Petitioner:
LEROY DADE
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTEND MARK COPOZZA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Packer v. Cappozza et al
as 1:2018cv01407
Respondent:
Mark Cappozza and PA Attorney General
Petitioner:
Gregory Leroy Packer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fuhrman v. Berryhill
as 3:2018cv01361
Plaintiff:
Todd Leroy Fuhrman
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BUTLER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2018cv00792
Plaintiff:
DORIAN LEROY BUTLER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SPANN v. DONOVAN et al
as 2:2018cv02050
Plaintiff:
LEROY SPANN
Defendant:
BRIAN DONOVAN and THE MEGAN LAW SECTION OF THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Mummert v. United States of America U.S. Department of Justice
as 1:2018cv00856
Plaintiff:
James Leroy Mummert, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STERLING v. DIGIORGIO et al
as 2:2018cv00159
Plaintiff:
LEROY STERLING, JR.
Defendant:
JOHN DIGIORGIO , ROBERT GORE and OTHER "KNOWN AND UNKNOWN PERSONS ACTING AS ATTORNEYS I IN VIOLATION OF STATE AND FEDERAL PROTECTED RIGHTS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
